Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The effects of smoking cessation and a programme intervention on birth and other perinatal outcomes among rural pregnant smokers

  • Geraldine R. Britton
  • , Gary D. James
  • , Rosemary Collier
  • , Lori Marie Sprague
  • , Jo Anne Brinthaupt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the perinatal outcomes of rural pregnant smokers enrolled in the Smoke Free Baby & Me trial. Methods: Data on smoking status and other pre-natal variables were collected during pregnancy. Outcomes were retrieved from a review of hospital records of 161 singleton births (79 from the control group, 82 from the intervention group). Results: The results show that, after adjusting for gender and gestational age, the more self-reported cigarettes at the first pre-natal visit, the less the infant birth weight (p = 0.033), the less maternal weight gain (p = 0.042) and the shorter the labour length (p = 0.041). Infants of women with positive urinary cotinine at the first pre-natal visit in the intervention group had higher 1 minute Apgar scores than those with negative cotinine (p = 0.022). Smokers also had a preponderance of male infants (64% vs 36%), while non-smokers had more females (59% vs 41%) (p = 0.006). Conclusions: Smoking during pregnancy affects perinatal outcomes. Assuming a foetal origin of chronic disease morbidity, implementing smoking cessation during pregnancy would not only improve maternal and foetal health, but also might contribute to an improvement in the incidence of adult chronic disease morbidity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)256-265
Number of pages10
JournalAnnals of Human Biology
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2013

Keywords

  • Perinatal outcomes
  • Pregnancy
  • Sex ratio
  • Smoking

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effects of smoking cessation and a programme intervention on birth and other perinatal outcomes among rural pregnant smokers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this