Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Evolving Design of NIH-Funded Cardio-Oncology Studies to Address Cancer Treatment-Related Cardiovascular Toxicity

  • Lori M. Minasian
  • , Eileen Dimond
  • , Myrtle Davis
  • , Bishow Adhikari
  • , Richard Fagerstrom
  • , Carol Fabian
  • , Justin Floyd
  • , Joseph M. Unger
  • , Pamela S. Douglas
  • , Karen M. Mustian
  • , Eric J. Chow
  • , Steven Lipshultz
  • , W. Gregory Hundley
  • , Saro H. Armenian
  • , Bonnie Ky
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • University of Kansas
  • Cancer Care Specialists of Illinois
  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  • Duke University
  • University of Rochester
  • University of Washington
  • Virginia Commonwealth University
  • City of Hope National Med Center
  • University of Pennsylvania

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

24 Scopus citations

Abstract

Cardiovascular (CV) toxicity from cancer therapy is a significant and growing concern. Conventional oncology clinical trial designs focused solely on cancer treatment efficacy have not provided sufficient information on both CV risk factors and outcomes. Similarly, traditional CV trials evaluating standard interventions typically exclude cancer patients, particularly those actively receiving cancer therapy. Neither trial type simultaneously evaluates the balance between CV toxicity and cancer outcomes; however, there is increasing collaboration among oncologists and cardiologists to design new cardio-oncology trials that address this important need. In this review, we detail 5 ongoing, oncology-based trials with integrated CV endpoints. Key design features include: 1) a careful assessment of CV risk factors and disease before, during, and after cancer therapy with standardized collection of clinical imaging, functional, and biomarker data; 2) an introduction of cardioprotective interventions at various timepoints in cancer therapy; 3) a balance of the risk of subclinical CV injury with the need for ongoing cancer treatment; and 4) an understanding of the time profile for development of clinically apparent CV toxicity. Additional critical priorities in cardio-oncology clinical research include harmonization of data collection and definitions for all physician- and patient-reported exposures and outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)105-113
Number of pages9
JournalJACC: CardioOncology
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2019

Keywords

  • adverse events
  • anthracyclines
  • cancer
  • cardioprotection
  • cardiotoxicity
  • chemotherapy
  • clinical trials
  • trastuzumab

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Evolving Design of NIH-Funded Cardio-Oncology Studies to Address Cancer Treatment-Related Cardiovascular Toxicity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this