Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Ezafe construction revisited

  • University of California at Los Angeles

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

This chapter addresses the nature, distribution and function of the Ezafe morpheme, a distinguishing grammatical feature of many of the Iranian languages. We review three main analyses advanced in the wide literature on the subject: semantic, morphological, and syntactic. We argue that the syntactic account of Ezafe is the most promising, both in its empirical reach, and explanatory power. Looking at an exhaustive range of data from Iranian Persian (iPersian) and other Iranian languages, we note that Ezafe occurs between nominal elements in the NP, PP, AP, and QPs. Following case theory (Chomsky 1981), we propose that Ezafe satisfies a licensing requirement in the following phrase, similar to 'of' in English. We then consider in detail the implications of this theory for the occurrence of Ezafe before PPs in iPersian and before finite and nonfinite complement clauses in iPerisan and Kurdish. Finally, we examine the occurrence of Ezafe in Zazaki 'double Ezafe constructions' and in Caspian languages showing the so-called 'Reverse Ezafe construction' in light of the case-based analysis.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationADVANCES IN IRANIAN LINGUISTICS
EditorsRichard K. Larson, Sedigheh Moradi, Vida Samiian
PublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company
Pages173-236
Number of pages64
ISBN (Electronic)9789027260932
DOIs
StatePublished - 2020

Publication series

NameCurrent Issues in Linguistic Theory
Volume351

Keywords

  • Adjective phrases
  • Case-based analysis
  • Complement clauses
  • Double Ezafe construction
  • Ezafe
  • Iranian languages
  • Licensing requirement
  • Morphological approach
  • NP modifiers and complements
  • Partitives
  • Post-nominal PP modifiers
  • Reverse Ezafe
  • Semantic approach

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Ezafe construction revisited'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this