Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The florence statement on triclosan and triclocarban

  • Rolf U. Halden
  • , Avery E. Lindeman
  • , Allison E. Aiello
  • , David Andrews
  • , William A. Arnold
  • , Patricia Fair
  • , Rebecca E. Fuoco
  • , Laura A. Geer
  • , Paula I. Johnson
  • , Rainer Lohmann
  • , Kristopher McNeill
  • , Victoria P. Sacks
  • , Ted Schettler
  • , Roland Weber
  • , R. Thomas Zoeller
  • , Arlene Blum
  • Arizona State University
  • Green Science Policy Institute
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Environmental Working Group
  • University of Minnesota Twin Cities
  • Medical University of South Carolina
  • Health Research Communication Strategies
  • California Department of Public Health
  • University of Rhode Island
  • Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich
  • Independent Researcher
  • Science and Environmental Health Network
  • POPs Environmental Consulting
  • University of Massachusetts
  • University of California at Berkeley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

202 Scopus citations

Abstract

The Florence Statement on Triclosan and Triclocarban documents a consensus of more than 200 scientists and medical professionals on the hazards of and lack of demonstrated benefit from common uses of triclosan and triclocarban. These chemicals may be used in thousands of personal care and consumer products as well as in building materials. Based on extensive peer-reviewed research, this statement concludes that triclosan and triclocarban are environmentally persistent endocrine disruptors that bioaccumulate in and are toxic to aquatic and other organisms. Evidence of other hazards to humans and ecosystems from triclosan and triclocarban is presented along with recommendations intended to prevent future harm from triclosan, triclocarban, and antimicrobial substances with similar properties and effects. Because antimicrobials can have unintended adverse health and environmental impacts, they should only be used when they provide an evidence-based health benefit. Greater transparency is needed in product formulations, and before an antimicrobial is incorporated into a product, the long-term health and ecological impacts should be evaluated.

Original languageEnglish
Article number064501
JournalEnvironmental Health Perspectives
Volume125
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The florence statement on triclosan and triclocarban'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this