Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The good, the bad, and the incomprehensible: Typifications of victims and offenders as antecedents of beliefs about sex crime

  • Virginia Commonwealth University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Scopus citations

Abstract

Public opinion has played a critical role in the development of sex crime laws. However, little scholarly work has focused directly on the origins of negative attitudes toward sex offenders. We address this research gap by developing and testing a theoretical account of such views. Drawing on recent national survey data, we examine the extent to which typifications about sexual victims and offenders—believing sex crime typically affects children and female victims and is committed by strangers—explain beliefs about the reformability of sex offenders, harm inflicted on victims, and the causes of offending. Results indicate that judging children to be typical targets of sex crimes is a key determinant of public views. We discuss the implications of our findings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)257-281
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Interpersonal Violence
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Keywords

  • Causal attributions
  • Crime perceptions
  • Sex offending
  • Victimization

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The good, the bad, and the incomprehensible: Typifications of victims and offenders as antecedents of beliefs about sex crime'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this