TY - GEN
T1 - THE HIDDEN OBSTACLES OF CONTINUOUS FLOW
T2 - 2024 International Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Management and 45th Annual Meeting: Engineering Management Riding the Waves of Smart Systems, ASEM 2024
AU - León, Cecilia Martínez
N1 - Publisher Copyright: Copyright © American Society for Engineering Management, 2024.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Continuous flow is a straightforward concept-easy to visualize but hard to materialize. This paper is not about sustaining but initiating a mindset of continuous flow. Working professionals, in their attempts to streamline and orchestrate the flows of information, materials, and work, face a road of obstacles that range from the operations not being conditioned for continuous flow and “I can't” mindsets from production associates that make it harder to flip the switch from a push, intermittent and bumpy operations to a pull, continuous, and smooth operations. We present a case of a company that was unprepared for continuous flow. This paper argues that raising awareness of those “hidden” or frequently neglected obstacles is the first step to overcoming them. Data from initial assessments of conventional lean metrics (lead time, cycle time, non-value-added percentage, walking distance, wait times, inventory levels, etc.) was pivotal to showing uncomfortable truths about disruptive operations. Leadership was pivotal in refocusing the attention on the future state with projected data. Overcoming one paradigm at a time and small, visible gains on the shopfloor were crucial. Listening sessions and discussion meetings were instrumental in overcoming one of the most challenging obstacles to continuous flow-the “I can't” mindset.
AB - Continuous flow is a straightforward concept-easy to visualize but hard to materialize. This paper is not about sustaining but initiating a mindset of continuous flow. Working professionals, in their attempts to streamline and orchestrate the flows of information, materials, and work, face a road of obstacles that range from the operations not being conditioned for continuous flow and “I can't” mindsets from production associates that make it harder to flip the switch from a push, intermittent and bumpy operations to a pull, continuous, and smooth operations. We present a case of a company that was unprepared for continuous flow. This paper argues that raising awareness of those “hidden” or frequently neglected obstacles is the first step to overcoming them. Data from initial assessments of conventional lean metrics (lead time, cycle time, non-value-added percentage, walking distance, wait times, inventory levels, etc.) was pivotal to showing uncomfortable truths about disruptive operations. Leadership was pivotal in refocusing the attention on the future state with projected data. Overcoming one paradigm at a time and small, visible gains on the shopfloor were crucial. Listening sessions and discussion meetings were instrumental in overcoming one of the most challenging obstacles to continuous flow-the “I can't” mindset.
KW - Case Study
KW - Continuous flow
KW - Implementation
KW - Kanban
KW - Obstacles
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85219271254
M3 - Conference contribution
T3 - Proceedings of the 2024 International Annual Conference and 45th Annual Meeting: Engineering Management Riding the Waves of Smart Systems, ASEM 2024
SP - 726
EP - 735
BT - Proceedings of the 2024 International Annual Conference and 45th Annual Meeting
A2 - Natarajan, Ganapathy
A2 - Zhang, Hao
A2 - Ng, Ean
PB - American Society for Engineering Management
Y2 - 6 November 2024 through 9 November 2024
ER -