Abstract
In this article, research on the natural course of illness among first-admission schizophrenic patients is reviewed from an epidemiological perspective. Three types of studies are considered: statistical reports dating primarily from the preneuroleptic era; long-term followback studies; and more recent prospectively designed cohort studies. Although relatively more first-admission patients have a positive course than do multiple admissions patients, the findings confirm the substantial heterogeneity in course and outcome. Methodological improvements in first-admission research are suggested, including separating the analyses of first-episode patients from those with past psychotic experiences; employing longitudinal methods for deriving diagnosis; including patients with drug and alcohol problems where appropriate; enlarging the samples either by multisite or multicenter collaborations or by pooling data across studies; and obtaining better data on treatment experiences in naturalistic research.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 185-207 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Schizophrenia Bulletin |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1992 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The natural course of schizophrenia: A review of first-admission studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver