Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The practice and economics of hybrid poplar biomass production for biofuels and bioproducts in the Pacific Northwest

  • Brian J. Stanton
  • , Andrew Bourque
  • , Mark Coleman
  • , Mark Eisenbies
  • , Rachel M. Emerson
  • , Jesus Espinoza
  • , Carlos Gantz
  • , Austin Himes
  • , Andrew Rodstrom
  • , Rich Shuren
  • , Rick Stonex
  • , Timothy Volk
  • , Jose Zerpa
  • GreenWood Resources Inc.
  • University of Idaho
  • Idaho National Laboratory
  • Mississippi State University
  • Inc.
  • GreenWood Resources

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

Hybrid poplar demonstration-scale farms were managed in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, and California to establish management practices, yields, harvesting methods, and the economics of biomass production. Yield during the 2-year establishment cycle averaged 3.5 dry Mg ha−1 year−1 increasing to 11.6 Mg ha−1 year−1 in the ensuing 3-year coppice cycle. Populus deltoides (Bartram ex Marsh.) × P. maximowiczii (Henry) varieties preformed best in Oregon during the coppice cycle with the best variety producing 18.1 Mg ha−1 year−1, while P. ×generosa (Henry) varieties maximized yields in Washington at 22.1 Mg ha−1 year−1. P. ×canadensis (Moench) varieties excelled in Idaho and California with upper yields of 13.6 Mg ha−1 year−1 and 12.9 Mg ha−1 year−1, respectively. Stands were cut with a single-pass harvester 2 years after planting and a second time after 3 years of coppice growth; material capacity, limited by poor ground conditions, varied between 21.7 to 31.3 green Mg h−1. Chemical composition averaged 1.87% inorganics, 7.74% extractives, 26.90% lignin, 38.07% glucan, 13.66% xylan, 1.61% galactan, 1.14% arabinan, and 2.76% mannan. Production costs (USD) projected over a 20-year rotation of six coppice cycles were $71.81 Mg−1 in Washington, $89.91 Mg−1 in Oregon, $98.76 Mg−1 in Idaho, and $179.07 Mg−1 in California. Land rental, establishment, crop care, harvest, transportation, and land restoration, respectively, accounted for 23%, 5%, 19%, 30%, 17%, and 6% of total feedstock cost. Farms were successfully restored to conditions existing before poplar conversion. In the absence of fertilization, increases in soil pH and decreases in nitrate-nitrogen, zinc, iron, and organic matter were consistently noted but could not be associated with poplar production alone.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)543-560
Number of pages18
JournalBioenergy Research
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2021

Keywords

  • Biomass production
  • Feedstock economics
  • Hybrid poplar
  • Populus
  • Single-pass harvesting
  • Wood chemistry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The practice and economics of hybrid poplar biomass production for biofuels and bioproducts in the Pacific Northwest'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this