Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The statistical comparison of clinical trials

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Being able to compare clinical trials using statistically proven analyses is essential, but certain protocols must be followed if such a comparison is to be made. The difficulty of making meaningful statistical comparisons is illustrated in 5 clinical trials comparing atypical antipsychotics. Certain judgments can be made on the basis of internal and external validity, for example, but there are many other areas - effect size, for example - in which it is impossible to make any statistical comparisons across these trials because they were not conducted in a uniform fashion. In the final analysis, it is doubtful that the differences between atypical antipsychotics covered in these trials are greater than those due to chance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)35-39
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Clinical Psychiatry
Volume62
Issue numberSUPPL. 9
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The statistical comparison of clinical trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this