Abstract
There have two recent challenges to the orthodoxy that ‘X trusts Y to ø’ is the fundamental notion of trust. Domenicucci and Holton maintain that trust, like love and friendship, is fundamentally two-place. Paul Faulkner argues to the more radical conclusion that the one-place ‘X is trusting’ is explanatorily basic. I argue that ‘X trusts Y in domain D’ is the explanatorily basic notion. I make the case that only by thinking of trust as domain-specific can we make sense of the relationships between trust and belief in goodwill, trust and distrust, and trust and trustworthiness. In addition, by modeling trust as essentially domain-specific we can account for the way in which wise trust in others is finely discriminating.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 240-250 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | International Journal of Philosophical Studies |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 15 2018 |
Keywords
- Trust
- distrust
- domain
- goodwill
- limits
- trustworthiness
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Trust within Limits'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver