Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Using Item Response Theory to Compare Irritability Measures in Early Adolescent and Childhood Samples

  • Lea R. Dougherty
  • , Maria M. Galano
  • , Emma Chad-Friedman
  • , Thomas M. Olino
  • , Sara J. Bufferd
  • , Daniel N. Klein
  • University of Maryland, College Park
  • University of Massachusetts
  • Temple University
  • University of Louisville

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

40 Scopus citations

Abstract

Limited psychometric information is available to guide best practices for measuring youth irritability. This report compares performance of irritability measures using item response theory (IRT). Study 1 used a sample of 482 early adolescents and compared the parent- and youth-report affective reactivity index (ARI) and irritability factors derived from the parent-report Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and clinician-administered Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders (K-SADS). Study 2 combined data from three childhood samples (N = 811) and compared performance of the parent-report ARI and CBCL and the clinician-administered Preschool Age Psychiatric Assessment (PAPA). The ARI emerged as the best measure of childhood irritability across the developmental periods, while the CBCL and K-SADS provided an adequate amount of information in early adolescents. No measure reliably assessed irritability at modest severity levels. Using IRT across large pools of developmental samples and measures is needed to guide the field in the measurement of youth irritability.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)918-927
Number of pages10
JournalAssessment
Volume28
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2021

Keywords

  • IRT
  • assessment
  • irritability
  • item response theory
  • measurement

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Using Item Response Theory to Compare Irritability Measures in Early Adolescent and Childhood Samples'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this