Utility of an oral examination in a surgical clerkship

To evaluate the utility of the oral examination in a surgical clerkship, we designed a prospective and randomized study to relate the subjective impressions of experienced examiners with an objective measure of cognitive knowledge. The examiners were asked to score the student's performance as honors, high satisfactory, satisfactory, or unsatisfactory, according to their subjective impression of the student's ability. Student performance was grouped according to oral examination performance. The cognitive performance in the honors group was significantly better than that of the other groups (Student's t-test, p=0.05). There was a significant difference in cognitive performance for oral examination groups throughout the rotations (analysis of variance, p=0.000; Kurskal Wallis, p=0.05). The oral examination is useful to identify a high level of cognitive achievement but cannot discriminate between groups of median to low competence. It should be used for educational feedback, career counseling, residency recommendations, and professional development.