Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Validation of inducible basophil biomarkers: Time, temperature and transportation

  • Theodore Kim
  • , Jing Yu
  • , Henry Li
  • , Mark Scarupa
  • , Richard L. Wasserman
  • , Athena Economides
  • , Martha White
  • , Carla Ward
  • , Atul Shah
  • , Douglas Jones
  • , Melinda Rathkopf
  • , Kelly Frye
  • , Ahmet Aybar
  • , Shahrooz Shayegan
  • , Benjamin Enav
  • , Laura Ispas
  • , Denise Loizou
  • , David Fitzhugh
  • , James Tracy
  • , James Friedlander
  • Zachary Jacobs, Jonathan Matz, David Golden, Donald McNeil, William McCann, Christopher Copenhaver, Jeffrey Factor, Raavi Gupta, Oral Alpan, Matthew Plassmeyer, Søren Ulrik Sønder
  • Allergy Partners of Northern Virginia
  • Institute for Asthma and Allergy
  • Allergy Partners of North Texas
  • New York Food Allergy and Wellness Center
  • Tanner Clinic
  • Allergy Asthma and Immunology Center of Alaska
  • Amerimmune
  • Annapolis Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition
  • Pediatric Gastroenterology of Northern Virginia
  • Allergy
  • Allergy Partners of Chapel Hill
  • Asthma and Immunology Associates
  • The Center for Allergy and Immunology
  • Allergy and Asthma Specialists of Maryland
  • OptiMed
  • Allergy Partners of Western North Carolina
  • New England Food Allergy Treatment Center

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The short stability window of several hours from blood collection to measuring basophil activation has limited the use of flow cytometry-based basophil activation assays in clinical settings. We examine if it is possible to extend this window to 1 day allowing for shipment of samples between laboratories. Several options exist for reporting the results including reporting all the measured values directly, calculating ratios and reporting a single value covering all measured results. Each of these options have different stability and value to the physician. Methods: Whole blood samples from peanut allergic patients were stimulated with four different peanut concentrations at Day 0, Day 1, and Day 2. Samples were stored under temperature-controlled conditions. Flow cytometry was used to analyze the samples. The basophil activation and degranulation were measured as percentage of positive CD63 basophils and CD203c MFI fold change. Shipped samples were transported under ambient conditions. Results: The results show that CD63 is a stable marker at Day 1. The CD203c ratio decreases significantly at Day 1. Calculating the CD63/IgE ratio proves to be more stable than CD63 alone. The most stable readouts are the semi-quantitative results and the trajectory of the dose response curve. Finally, we confirmed that the stability can be extended to samples shipped overnight to the laboratory. Conclusions: It is possible to extend the stability of the basophil activation assay to 1 day for samples stored at 18–25°C as well as samples shipped under ambient conditions as long as the temperature is within the 2–37°C range.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)632-644
Number of pages13
JournalCytometry Part B - Clinical Cytometry
Volume100
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2021

Keywords

  • CD63
  • allergy
  • basophil activation test
  • basophils
  • peanut allergy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validation of inducible basophil biomarkers: Time, temperature and transportation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this