Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Variation in Hospital-Specific Rates of Suboptimal Lymphadenectomy and Survival in Colon Cancer: Evidence from the National Cancer Data Base

  • Adan Z. Becerra
  • , Mariana E. Berho
  • , Christian P. Probst
  • , Christopher T. Aquina
  • , Mohamedtaki A. Tejani
  • , Maynor G. Gonzalez
  • , Zhaomin Xu
  • , Alex A. Swanger
  • , Katia Noyes
  • , John R. Monson
  • , Fergal J. Fleming

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Little is known about between-hospital differences in the rate of suboptimal lymphadenectomy. This study characterizes variation in hospital-specific rates of suboptimal lymphadenectomy and its effect on overall survival in a national hospital-based registry. Methods: Stage I–III colon cancer patients were identified from the 2003–2012 National Cancer Data Base. Bayesian multilevel logistic regression models were used to assess the impact of patient- and hospital-level factors on hospital-specific rates of suboptimal lymphadenectomy (<12 lymph nodes), and multilevel Cox models were used to estimate the effect of suboptimal lymphadenectomy at the patient (yes vs. no) and hospital level (quartiles of hospital-specific rates) on overall survival. Results: A total of 360,846 patients across 1345 hospitals in the US met the inclusion criteria, of which 25 % had a suboptimal lymphadenectomy. Wide variation was observed in hospital-specific rates of suboptimal lymphadenectomy (range 0–82 %, median 44 %). Older age, male sex, comorbidity score, no insurance, positive margins, lower tumor grade, lower T and N stage, and sigmoid and left colectomy were associated with higher odds of suboptimal lymphadenectomy. Patients treated at lower-volume and non-academic hospitals had higher odds of suboptimal lymphadenectomy. Patient- and hospital-level factors explained 5 % of the between-hospital variability in suboptimal lymphadenectomy, leaving 95 % unexplained. Higher suboptimal lymphadenectomy rates were associated with worse survival (quartile 4 vs. quartile 1: hazard ratio 1.19, 95 % confidence interval 1.16–1.22). Conclusion: Large differences in hospital-specific rates of suboptimal lymphadenectomy were observed, and this variation was associated with survival. Quality improvement initiatives targeting hospital-level adherence to the national standard may improve overall survival among resected colon cancer patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)674-683
Number of pages10
JournalAnnals of Surgical Oncology
Volume23
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Variation in Hospital-Specific Rates of Suboptimal Lymphadenectomy and Survival in Colon Cancer: Evidence from the National Cancer Data Base'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this