Abstract
“Giving voice” to participants has been an important element of qualitative feminist research projects in geography. In this article, I explore scholarship that has questioned qualitative research's reliance on voice, arguing that implicit connections between voice, authenticity, and empowerment are beginning to be unpacked, particularly by scholars engaged in anticolonial work. I draw on anticolonial scholarship to build on and extend feminist debates centered on voice and participation. Feminist attention to voice must be situated within the colonial frameworks and histories of social science research. Scholarship focused on ongoing settler colonial relationships highlights methods both for cautiously proceeding with and consciously refusing incorporating voice within qualitative research. I draw on anticolonial approaches to frame research decisions, voice, and the ethical and methodological dilemmas of its use.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 314-320 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Professional Geographer |
| Volume | 69 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 3 2017 |
Keywords
- colonialism
- feminist methods
- proceeding
- qualitative research
- refusing
- research methodology
- voice
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Voice Under Scrutiny: Feminist Methods, Anticolonial Responses, and New Methodological Tools'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver