Wishful Thinking vs. Hopeful Action: Response to Diehm on American Chestnut Restoration

Christian Diehm has argued against using a genetically modified American chestnut variety in forest restoration. He is concerned that a GM variety sets a bad precedent and is disrespectful toward nature. He is also concerned that not enough has been done to consult with Native American tribes. We give evidence that consultation with tribes, environmental organizations, and the public is valuable and necessary–and that there is support for the GM chestnut. Genetic modification that saves a species from functional extinction shows respect to that species and its ecological relationships. Hopeful, wise, coordinated action is needed to save ecosystems.