Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Youth in Foster Care and the Reasonable and Prudent Parenting Standard

  • Amanda Stafford McRell
  • , Christian E. Holmes
  • , Akanksha Singh
  • , Sue E. Levkoff
  • , Benjamin Schooley
  • , Neşet Hikmet
  • , Kristen D. Seay
  • University of South Carolina

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Children in foster care face disproportionate rates of biopsychosocial challenges but social and extracurricular activities (SEAs) may support their healthy development. The Reasonable and Prudent Parenting Standard (RPPS), a 2014 federal policy, aims to increase access to these opportunities for children in foster care. Analyses of statutes from 50 US states and the District of Columbia (n = 51) revealed similarities and differences in state-level RPPS policy implementation. Building on these findings, researchers conducted semi-structured retrospective telephone interviews with foster parents across one southeastern state (n = 20) to identify local retrospective perspectives on RPPS implementation. Using thematic inductive coding two unique themes emerged about SEAs prior to RPPS: 1) negative social impacts and 2) complicated activity approval processes. Three unique themes emerged after RPPS: 1) empowerment, 2) implementation disparities and 3) resource recommendations. Policy implications include the need to support foster parents by increasing resources (funding, transportation, access), clarifying liability and clarifying motivation expectations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)302-312
Number of pages11
JournalChild Maltreatment
Volume26
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2021

Keywords

  • child protective services
  • child welfare
  • child well-being
  • extracurricular
  • foster care
  • parenting
  • reasonable and prudent parenting standard policy
  • social

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Youth in Foster Care and the Reasonable and Prudent Parenting Standard'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this